It is the parent's right to be informed. This is the point - not the sex ed debate. There are policies in force for everyone to follow, not a select few.
parents still have the legal right to determine/choose which is the most appropriate sex ed route for their child. A school principal does not have the right to ignore district and state policy. teachers cannot show educational PG13 videos in class and yet this principal feels it's ok to allow a graphic penis be shown with a blister on it?She should be reprimanded and not have the district cover up the mess. Additionally, 2 hours notice for a parent meeting is also unacceptable. Most parents work and will be unable to attend. Geez,This was probably done in hopes no one would be able to attend. Not Right!
It is the parent's right to be informed. This is the point - not the sex ed debate. There are policies in force for everyone to follow, not a select few.
You should give parents more credit. Narrow minded? Education involves parents at all levels.
parents still have the legal right to determine/choose which is the most appropriate sex ed route for their child. A school principal does not have the right to ignore district and state policy. teachers cannot show educational PG13 videos in class and yet this principal feels it's ok to allow a graphic penis be shown with a blister on it?She should be reprimanded and not have the district cover up the mess. Additionally, 2 hours notice for a parent meeting is also unacceptable. Most parents work and will be unable to attend. Geez,This was probably done in hopes no one would be able to attend. Not Right!