Re: District Attorney Responds to Harsh Criticism from Pastor Tom Brown's Lawyers
By Bertram888
Created Aug 23 2011 - 9:33am
Bertram888 August 23, 2011 at 9:33am
As per the "Judge's Detailed Ruling", certain people were not entitled to Medical coverage and that is why he did not side with them. As a matter of fact, those same city employees and their dependents HAD NOT been entitled to the benefits - ever! Yet, Crook illegally authorized coverage for those city employees - regardless of results of election. JAIME, WHY DON'T YOU PROSECUTE THE MAYOR AND HIS TWO CRONIES FOR USING CITY FUNDS (PAID BY TAX PAYERS) ILLEGALLY??? DON'T HIDE BY NOT RESPONDING.
Bertram888 August 23, 2011
at 9:33am
As per the "Judge's Detailed Ruling", certain people were not entitled to Medical coverage and that is why he did not side with them. As a matter of fact, those same city employees and their dependents HAD NOT been entitled to the benefits - ever! Yet, Crook illegally authorized coverage for those city employees - regardless of results of election. JAIME, WHY DON'T YOU PROSECUTE THE MAYOR AND HIS TWO CRONIES FOR USING CITY FUNDS (PAID BY TAX PAYERS) ILLEGALLY??? DON'T HIDE BY NOT RESPONDING.