Re: Amendment to Domestic Partner Ordinance Proposed
By ruclevr
Created Dec 13 2010 - 12:41pm
ruclevr December 13, 2010 at 11:41am
All they have to do is change the wording to define, "A domestic partner as that of a relationship between and man and a woman." Personally they shoud require a marriage certificate. Under the eyes of the law if you are considering yourself partners then you are considered to be married and a certificate should be no big deal. If they are trying to avoid the expense of a wedding, then allow them to pay $50 sign a certificate and that is it.
ruclevr December 13, 2010
at 11:41am
All they have to do is change the wording to define, "A domestic partner as that of a relationship between and man and a woman." Personally they shoud require a marriage certificate. Under the eyes of the law if you are considering yourself partners then you are considered to be married and a certificate should be no big deal. If they are trying to avoid the expense of a wedding, then allow them to pay $50 sign a certificate and that is it.